home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: engnews1.Eng.Sun.COM!taumet!clamage
- From: qsoft@gpnet.it (Pierfranco Ferronato)
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
- Subject: class/object protection
- Date: 7 Feb 1996 17:22:35 GMT
- Organization: Quality Software
- Approved: clamage@eng.sun.com (comp.std.c++)
- Message-ID: <4fan26$5t3@home.gpnet.it>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: taumet.eng.sun.com
- Content-Type: text
- X-Nntp-Posting-Host: @ts4103.gpnet.it
- X-Newsreader: NeoLogic News for OS/2 [version: 4.2 UNREGISTERED 12 days remaining]
- Content-Length: 573
- X-Lines: 20
- Originator: clamage@taumet
-
- Hello there!
-
- a simple, hope not silly, question.
- Would't it be reasonable to have object protection instread of class
- protection in C++ ?
- Let me say that allowing to access the private attributes of object of the
- same kind of "this" is not a strictly OO view.
-
- bye bye
-
- //----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- // Quality Software srl
- // -= the OO Software Factory =-
- // Via A.Canova 34/5
- // 31044 Montebelluna (TV) - Italy
- // tel: +39-423-600210
- // fax: +39-423-302312
- // email:qsoft@gpnet.it
- // www :we are working on it :)
-
-
- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
- Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy is
- summarized in http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/policy.html
- ]
-